|
|
|
|
| Ok.... I was doing a dns report on my websites from dnsreport.com
I got curious about MICROSOFT's
dns report. So I ran it. It didn't do to bad, but my favorite part is here & here.
It pretty much sums up the WORLDS
opinion about M$! - simplyjd ;-} |
DNS Report for microsoft.com
| NS |
INFO |
NS records at your nameservers |
Your NS records at your nameservers are: ns1.msft.net. [TTL=172800] ns2.msft.net. [TTL=172800] ns3.msft.net. [TTL=172800] ns4.msft.net. [TTL=172800] ns5.msft.net. [TTL=172800] |
|
|
PASS |
All nameservers report identical NS records | OK. The NS records at all your nameservers are identical. | ||
|
PASS |
All nameservers respond | OK. All of your nameservers listed at the parent nameservers responded. | ||
|
PASS |
Nameserver name validity | OK. All of the NS records that your nameservers report seem valid (no IPs or partial domain names). | ||
|
PASS |
Number of nameservers | OK. You have 5 nameservers. You must have at least 2 nameservers (RFC2182 section 5 recommends at least 3 nameservers), and preferably no more than 7. | ||
|
PASS |
Lame nameservers | OK. All the nameservers listed at the parent servers answer authoritatively for your domain. | ||
|
PASS |
Missing (stealth) nameservers | OK. All 5 of your nameservers (as reported by your nameservers) are also listed at the parent servers. | ||
|
PASS |
Missing nameservers 2 | OK. All of the nameservers listed at the parent nameservers are also listed as NS records at your nameservers. | ||
|
PASS |
No CNAMEs for domain | OK. There are no CNAMEs for microsoft.com. RFC1912 2.4 and RFC2181 10.3 state that there should be no CNAMEs if an NS (or any other) record is present. Note that I only checked microsoft.com, I did not check the NS records, which should not have CNAMEs either. | ||
|
PASS |
No NSs with CNAMEs | OK. There are no CNAMEs for your NS records. RFC1912 2.4 and RFC2181 10.3 state that there should be no CNAMEs if an NS (or any other) record is present. | ||
|
PASS |
Nameservers on separate class C's | OK. You have nameservers on different Class C (technically, /24) IP ranges. You must have nameservers at geographically and topologically dispersed locations. RFC2182 3.1 goes into more detail about secondary nameserver location. | ||
|
PASS |
All NS IPs public | OK. All of your NS records appear to use public IPs. If there were any private IPs, they would not be reachable, causing DNS delays. | ||
|
INFO |
Nameservers versions | Your nameservers have the following versions: 207.46.245.230: No version info available (CHAOS not implemented). 64.4.25.30: No version info available (CHAOS not implemented). 213.199.144.151: No version info available (CHAOS not implemented). 207.46.66.75: No version info available (CHAOS not implemented). 207.46.138.20: No version info available (CHAOS not implemented). |
||
|
PASS |
Stealth NS record leakage | Your DNS servers do not leak any stealth NS records (if any) in non-NS requests. |
| MX |
INFO |
MX Record | Your 3 MX records are: 10 maila.microsoft.com. [TTL=3600] IP=131.107.3.124 [TTL=3600] [US] IP=131.107.3.125 [TTL=3600] [US] 10 mailb.microsoft.com. [TTL=3600] IP=131.107.3.123 [TTL=3600] [US] IP=207.46.121.51 [TTL=3600] [US] 10 mailc.microsoft.com. [TTL=3600] IP=207.46.121.53 [TTL=3600] [US] IP=207.46.121.52 [TTL=3600] [US] |
|
PASS |
Invalid characters | OK. All of your MX records appear to use valid hostnames, without any invalid characters. | |
|
PASS |
All MX IPs public | OK. All of your MX records appear to use public IPs. If there were any private IPs, they would not be reachable, causing slight mail delays, extra resource usage, and possibly bounced mail. | |
|
PASS |
MX records are not CNAMEs | OK. Looking up your MX record did not just return a CNAME. If an MX record query returns a CNAME, extra processing is required, and some mail servers may not be able to handle it. | |
|
PASS |
MX A lookups have no CNAMEs | OK. There appear to be no CNAMEs returned for A records lookups from your MX records (CNAMEs are prohibited in MX records, according to RFC974, RFC1034 3.6.2, RFC1912 2.4, and RFC2181 10.3). | |
|
PASS |
MX is host name, not IP | OK. All of your MX records are host names (as opposed to IP addresses, which are not allowed in MX records). | |
|
PASS |
Multiple MX records | OK. You have multiple MX records. This means that if one is down or unreachable, the other(s) will be able to accept mail for you. | |
|
PASS |
Duplicate MX records | OK. You do not have any duplicate MX records (pointing to the same IP). Although technically valid, duplicate MX records can cause a lot of confusion, and waste resources. | |
|
PASS |
Reverse DNS entries for MX records |
OK. The IPs of all of your mail server(s) have reverse DNS (PTR) entries. RFC1912 2.1 says you should have a reverse DNS for all your mail servers. It is strongly urged that you have them, as many mailservers will not accept mail from mailservers with no reverse DNS entry. Note that this information is cached, so if you changed it recently, it will not be reflected here (see the www.DNSstuff.com Reverse DNS Tool for the current data). The reverse DNS entries are: 125.3.107.131.in-addr.arpa mail1.microsoft.com. [TTL=19] (thorough check) 51.121.46.207.in-addr.arpa mail4.microsoft.com. [TTL=19] (thorough check) 52.121.46.207.in-addr.arpa mailc.microsoft.com. [TTL=19] (thorough check) |
|
PASS |
Connect to mail servers | OK: I was able to connect to all of your mailservers. | |
|
PASS |
Mail server host name in greeting |
OK: All of your mailservers have their host name in the greeting: mailb.microsoft.com: 220 IGS-IMC-01.northamerica.corp.microsoft.com |
|
|
PASS |
Acceptance of NULL sender | OK: All of your mailservers accept mail from "". You are required (RFC1123 5.2.9) to receive this type of mail (which includes reject/bounce messages and return receipts). | |
|
PASS |
Acceptance of postmaster address | OK: All of your mailservers accept mail to postmaster@microsoft.com (as required by RFC822 6.3, RFC1123 5.2.7, and RFC2821 4.5.1). | |
|
PASS |
Acceptance of abuse address | OK: All of your mailservers accept mail to abuse@microsoft.com. | |
|
WARN |
Acceptance of domain literals |
WARN: One or more of your mailservers does not accept mail in the domain literal format (user@[0.0.0.0]). Mailservers are technically required RFC1123 5.2.17 to accept mail to domain literals for any of its IP addresses. Not accepting domain literals can make it more difficult to test your mailserver, and can prevent you from receiving E-mail from people reporting problems with your mailserver. However, it is unlikely that any problems will occur if the domain literals are not accepted. mailb.microsoft.com's postmaster@[207.46.121.51] response:
>>> RCPT TO:<postmaster@[207.46.121.51]>
<<< 550 5.7.1 Unable to relay for postmaster@[207.46.121.51]
mailc.microsoft.com's postmaster@[207.46.121.52] response:
>>> RCPT TO:<postmaster@[207.46.121.52]>
<<< 550 5.7.1 Unable to relay for postmaster@[207.46.121.52]
maila.microsoft.com's postmaster@[131.107.3.125] response:
>>> RCPT TO:<postmaster@[131.107.3.125]>
<<< 550 5.7.1 Unable to relay for postmaster@[131.107.3.125]
|
|
|
PASS |
Open relay test | OK: All of your mailservers appear to be closed to relaying. This is not a thorough check, you can get a
thorough one here. mailb.microsoft.com OK: 550 5.7.1 Unable to relay for Not.abuse.see.www.DNSreport.com.from.IP.65.40.223.158@DNSreport.com mailc.microsoft.com OK: 550 5.7.1 Unable to relay for Not.abuse.see.www.DNSreport.com.from.IP.65.40.223.158@DNSreport.com maila.microsoft.com OK: 550 5.7.1 Unable to relay for Not.abuse.see.www.DNSreport.com.from.IP.65.40.223.158@DNSreport.com |
|
|
PASS |
SPF record |
You have an SPF record. This is very good, as it will help prevent spammers from abusing your domain. Your SPF record is: "v=spf1 mx redirect=_spf.microsoft.com" [TTL=3600] |
| WWW |
INFO |
WWW Record |
Your www.microsoft.com A record is: www.microsoft.com. CNAME www.microsoft.com.nsatc.net. [TTL=3600] |
|
PASS |
All WWW IPs public | OK. All of your WWW IPs appear to be public IPs. If there were any private IPs, they would not be reachable, causing problems reaching your web site. | |
|
WARN |
CNAME Lookup | WARNING. Your web site (www.microsoft.com) has a CNAME record pointing to www.microsoft.com.nsatc.net.. That by itself is confusing, but acceptable. However, the CNAME record in this case causes an extra DNS lookup, which will slightly delay visitors to your website, and use extra bandwidth. |
|
|
|
|







